Analysis of the application of the principle of objectivity by the Attorney General's Office of the State of Ecuador

Abstract

This article examines how the Attorney General's Office of Ecuador applies the principle of objectivity to ensure fair and impartial criminal investigations and proceedings. The principle of objectivity requires that decisions be based on facts and evidence rather than personal biases or external influences. Despite the legal and international normative provisions emphasizing objectivity, its implementation in Ecuador faces challenges. One key challenge is political influence in the Attorney General's Office. The proximity between political power and the Attorney General often raises doubts about the impartiality of decisions. Additionally, the lack of financial independence can affect the Attorney General's Office's ability to act objectively, as it could depend on government resources subject to political pressures. Another challenge is training and institutional culture. It is crucial that prosecutors are adequately trained to effectively apply the principle of objectivity. Furthermore, the Attorney General's Office must promote an internal culture that fosters impartiality and transparency at all stages of the investigation and criminal process. As a result, to improve the objectivity of the Attorney General's Office, it is necessary to address these challenges. This could involve ensuring the political and financial independence of the Attorney General's Office, as well as strengthening training and institutional culture. Additionally, mechanisms for oversight and accountability should be implemented to ensure that the Attorney General's Office fulfills its duty to act objectively at all times.