Conceptual and methodological differences between qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research in education: a critical analysis of common errors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59169/pentaciencias.v7i4.1611Keywords:
Qualitative research; quantitative research; mixed methods research; educational methodology; methodological trainingAbstract
This article provides a critical analysis of the conceptual and methodological differences between qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research in the field of education. It highlights the importance of understanding epistemological approaches and data collection and analysis techniques to avoid methodological confusion. It explains the main criteria that define each approach, emphasizing that the mere use of numerical instruments, such as Likert scale surveys, does not automatically make a study quantitative or mixed. Proper classification requires the intention and logic of the analysis, as well as a coherent integration of methods. In addition, it describes the most common methodological designs in mixed studies and frequent errors in their application. Finally, it proposes strengthening the methodological training of researchers to improve the quality and validity of scientific production in education. This work is part of the research project " Fortalecimiento del nivel didáctico-pedagógico de los docentes en las instituciones educactivas del cantón Jipijapa " and the outreach project "Tareas dirigidas y apoyo psicopedagógico para fortalecer el aprendizaje de los alumnos en la Educación Básica Pública de Jipijapa, Fase III – 2025"
Downloads
References
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. In Review of General Psychology (Vol. 1, Issue 3).
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design_ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2013, SAGE Publications, Inc) - libgen.li (4th ed.). SAGE. https://libgen.li/edition.php?id=151600297
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. (2018). RESEARCH DESIGN Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Plano, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2013). Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE.
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs - Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 PART2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Flick, U. (2014). AN INTRODUCTION TO QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (5th ed.). SAGE. https://dl1.cuni.cz/pluginfile.php/1832172/mod_resource/content/1/Uwe%20Flick%20-%20An%20Introduction%20to%20Qualitative%20Research%202014.pdf
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Hernández-Sampieri, Roberto., & Mendoza Torres, C. Paulina. (2018). Metodología de la investigación : las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education.
Johnson, B., & Chirstensen, L. (2019). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches Seventh Edition (7th ed.). SAGE.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975
Muijs, D. (2010). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2015). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. In SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Científica Arbitrada Multidisciplinaria PENTACIENCIAS - ISSN 2806-5794.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

