Feasibility analysis: communication and control of a KUKA KR10R900SIXX robotic manipulator via Tcp/Ip on a Remote Pc

Authors

Keywords:

Tool, methods, communication, controller, manipulator

Abstract

In this article, the interconnection between Matlab and the KUKA Model KR 10 R900 sixx robot, which is located at the Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, is studied and subsequently tested, through the use of a tool in the Matlab software that will solve its inverse kinematics through a kinematic method executed in a script of the same. For better handling when sending data and verifying them. KUKA Control Toolbox (KCT) is a collection of MATLAB functions for motion control of KUKA robot manipulators, running on a remote computer connected to the KUKA controller via TCP/IP. Reference is made to many methods for the communication and control of the robotic manipulator to get the control of the robot by PC, one of them is also the RoboDK interface with which it has TCP/IP communication to interact with the IP of the KUKA KR10R900 robotic manipulator.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. I. Corke, “A robotics toolbox for matlab,” IEEE Robotics & Automa tion Magazine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 1996.

RoboDK, “Controlador robodk para kuka,” in Robots KUKA. https://robodk.com/doc/en/RobotsKUKA.htmlDriverKUKA. [Último acceso: 29 12 2022]., 2021.

G. Biggs and B. MacDonald, “A survey of robot programming systems,” in Proceedings of the Australasian conference on robotics and automa tion, vol. 1, 2003, pp. 1–3.

F. Chinello, S. Scheggi, F. Morbidi, and D. Prattichizzo, “Kct: a matlab toolbox for motion control of kuka robot manipulators,” in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2010,

pp. 4603–4608.

J.Y. Bouguet, “Camera calibration toolbox for matlab,” http://www. vision. caltech. edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/index. html, 2004.

[B. Siciliano, L. Sciavicco, L. Villani, and G. Oriolo, Force control. Springer, 2009.

M. W. Spong, S. Hutchinson, M. Vidyasagar et al., Robot modeling and control. Wiley New York, 2006, vol. 3.

B. Espiau, F. Chaumette, and P. Rives, “A new approach to visual servoing in robotics,” ieee Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 313–326, 1992.

M. De Pascale and D. Prattichizzo, “The haptik library,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 64–75, 2007.

atvise, “¿qué es opc ua? descubre la arquitectura unificada.” in OPC UA. https://atvise.vesterbusiness.com/news/queesopcua arquitecturaunificada/. [Último acceso: 05 07 2022]., 2021, pp. 21–35.

infoPLC, “Abb robot irc5 opc ua server,” in OPC Toolbox. User’s Guide. MATLAB and SIMULINK. R2021a. https://www.infoplc.net/descargas/46abbrobotica/3288 abbrobot irc5opcuaserver. [Último acceso: 04 07 2022]. 2021, pp. 15–21.

Chakraborty, S., & Aithal, P. (2021). Forward and Inverse Kinematics Demonstration using RoboDK and C. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 5(1), 97105. https://scholar.archive.org/work/ddze7gbndzgyxd6atbndhk426m/access/wayback/https://srinivaspublication.com/wpcontent/uploads/2021/06/8.ForwardandInverse_Fullpaper.pdf

Dahari, M., & Tan, J.D. (2011). Forward and inverse kinematics model for robotic welding process using KR16KS KUKA robot. 2011 Fourth International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization,

García, M. V., Irisarri, E., & Pérez, F. (2017). Integración Vertical en plantas industriales utilizando OPC UA e IEC61499. Enfoque UTE, 8, 287299. http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?pid=S139065422017000100287&script=sci_arttext

Gasca, Y., & Mar, O. (2021). Design of the LAN Network of Hospital Comandante Manuel Piti Fajardo. International Journal of Wireless and Ad Hoc Communication, 2(2), 8898.

Hirzinger, G., Bals, J., Otter, M., & Stelter, J. (2005). The DLRKUKA success story: robotics research improves industrial robots. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 12(3), 1623. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1511865/

RiveraVelazquez, F., SalazarValle, E., & MartínezAguilar, G. M. (2022). Control PID didáctico con Servidor OPC UA. RISTIRevista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação(45), 7799. https://scielo.pt/pdf/rist/n45/16469895rist4577.pdf

Sanfilippo, F., Hatledal, L. I., Zhang, H., Fago, M., & Pettersen, K. Y. (2014). JOpenShowVar: an opensource crossplatform communication interface to kuka robots. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA),

Shepherd, S., & Buchstab, A. (2014). Kuka robots onsite. In Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2014 (pp. 373380). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/9783319046631_26

Tebbe, J., Gao, Y., SastreRienietz, M., & Zell, A. (2019). A table tennis robot system using an industrial kuka robot arm. German conference on pattern recognition,

Walde, K., & Ramtekkar, P. (2022). Designing Parameters and MATLAB Model of 11 KV/440volt Mobile Distribution Station. 2022 2nd Asian Conference on Innovation in Technology (ASIANCON),

Published

2023-01-27

How to Cite

Garcés Villacis, E. F. ., Pilco Domínguez, J. B. ., & Ñacato Estrella, D. R. . (2023). Feasibility analysis: communication and control of a KUKA KR10R900SIXX robotic manipulator via Tcp/Ip on a Remote Pc . Revista Científica Arbitrada Multidisciplinaria PENTACIENCIAS - ISSN 2806-5794., 5(1), 593–605. Retrieved from https://editorialalema.org/index.php/pentaciencias/article/view/473

Issue

Section

Artículos originales