Estructura organizacional, desempeño del rol individual en el trabajo, alienación y las TIC en Tabasco, México

Juan Carlos Lorenzo  Esquivel Checa

Authors

Juan Carlos Lorenzo Esquivel Checa Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara Campus Tabasco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5209-3235

Keywords:

Organizational structure; Alienation; Individual role performance at work, TIC

Abstract

This research addresses the problem of Alienation from work and its impact on positive Roles at work and the Organizational Structure. In this sense, the general objectives are: 1) to explain to what extent the Organizational Structure determines the Individual Work Roles: compliant, adaptive and proactive; 2) explain to what extent Alienation intervenes in the relationship between the Perceived Organizational Structure and the Role in the performance of individual Work; and 3) explain to what extent the ICT Organizational Capacities affect the Organizational Structure: complexity, centralization and formalization. The research is quantitative, follows deductive logic. It uses Structural Equation Models (SEM) as a statistical method to test hypotheses. The scope is correlational, by making a cross-sectional study of the relevant variables, ex post facto and confirmatory. The subjects were addressed directly and individually, in the context of the construction sector in the State of Tabasco, Mexico, and within these companies. The final instrument, although it comes mostly from previous research with high levels of reliability and validity, was subjected to an iterative process of cross-translation and substantive validation with experts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiken, M., y Hage, J. (1966). Organizational alienation: A comparative analysis, American Sociological Review, vol. 31, pp. 497-507.

Aiken, M., y Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure, American Sociological Review, vol. 33, n.0 6, pp. 9 12-930.

Archibald, W. P. (2009). Marx, Globalization and Alienation: Received and Underappreciated Wisdoms. Critical Sociology, 35(2), 151-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920508099190

Argyris, C. (1957). The Individual and Organization: Some Problems of Mutual Adjustment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390587

Blau, P.M., Falbe, C. M., McKinley, W. y Tracy, P. K. (1976). Technology and organization in manufacturing, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20-40.

Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations, American Sociological Review, 35, 2, 201-218.

Blau, P. M. y Schoenherr, R. A. (1971). The Structure of Organizations, Nueva York, Basic Books.

Bunge, A. Mario. (1969). La investigación científica. Su estrategia y su filosofía. Barcelona: Ariel, ISBN 968-23-2225-1

Burns, T. y Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Londres, Tavistock Publications Ltd.

Child, J. (1974). Organization Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice, Sociology, 6, 1-22

Clark, Sara K.; Halbesleben, Jonathon R. B.; Lester, Scott W. y Heintz, Robert (2010). Temporary Worker Alienation and Job Performance: The Impact of Rating Source. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 2010 17: 287. http://jlo.sagepub.com/content/17/3/287. DOI: 10.1177/1548051810368679

Duncan, R. B. (1971). The effects of perceived environmental uncertainty on organizational decision unit structure: A cybernetic model, Yale University.

Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization Design: An information processing view. Interfaces, vol. 4, núm. 3, Pp. 28-36.

Griffin, M. A., Neal, A. y Parker, S. K. (2007). A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438

Hage, J. (1965). An Axiomatic Theory Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 3, 289-320.

Hage, J., y Aiken, M. (1967). Relationship of Centralization to Other Structural Properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391213

Haidar, E. (2015). Apuntes de Estadística para la Investigación Científica. Introducción a la computación de la estadística moderna utilizando R. Primera Edición. México.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., y Black, W. C. (2010). Análisis Multivariante (5ta Ed.). Madrid: Prentice Hall Iberia.

Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., y Jensen, O. (2000). Fundamental Changes in Marketing Organization: The Movement toward a Customer-Focused Organizational Structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 459-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300284001

Hrebiniak, L. G. (1974). Job Technology, Supervision, and Work-Group Structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(3), 395-410.

Johanim, J., Khulida K. y. and Abdullah, O. (2010). Psychometric Properties of organizational Structure Scale in the Malaysian Public Service Agencies: Preliminary Results. International Journal of Management Studies, Vol 17 No1, pp.34-45.

Katz, D., y Kahn, R. L. (1978). Psicología social de las organizaciones. Trillas.

Lawrence Paul R. y Lorsch W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 1 (jun., 1967), pp. 1-47.

Martínez-Hechevarría, M. A. (1999). Gobierno y División del Trabajo. Revista Empresa y Humanismo, vol. I, núm. 1/99, Pp. 91-129.

Marx, K. (1844). The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. Disponible en: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/preface.htm. Recuperado el 12 de junio de 2011.

Mohr, L. B. (1971). Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(4), 444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391764

Morgan, G. (1993). Organizational Choice and the New Technology. En E. Trist, H. Murray, y B. Trist (Eds.), The Social Engagement of Social Science, Volume 2. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512819052-022

Parker, S. K., Williams, H., M. y Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 636–652.

Pennings, J. M. (1973). Measures of organizational structure: A Methodological Note, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 79, n.0 3, pp. 686-704

Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis or organizations. American Sociological Review, 194-208.

Pugh, D. S. (1973): The Measurement of Organization Structures. Does Context Determine Form? Organizational Dynamics, primavera, 19-34

Pugh, D. S. y Hinings, C. R. (1976): Organizational Structure: Extensions and Replications: The Aston Programme II. Farnborough, Hants, Reino Unido: Saxon House.

Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J, Hinings, C.R. y Turner, C. (1969). The context of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8, 91-114.

Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.J., McDonald, K., Turner, C. y Lupton, T. (1963). A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8.

Quirós, Isabel. (2002). Un análisis de las medidas de Estructura Organizacional: estructura diseñada frente a estructura emergente. Cuadernos de Estudios Empresariales, 2002. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27581446

Scott, W. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Organizational Sociology, vol. 30, Pp.1-21.

Simon, H. A. (1962). The Architecture of complexity. Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 106, Núm. 6, Pp. 467-482.

Yusliza, M. Y., Hazman, S. and Ramayah, T. (2007). An examination of the validity and reliability of the organizational structure scale in the Malaysian context: Preliminary results. Journal of International Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol 13 No 1, pp. 39-54.